Peer Evaluation Form ==================== **Each** member of the group completes **one** form. ### Instructions ### 1. Cut out the text indicated below and use as a template. 2. Complete the form, rating each person in your group on a scale of 0 to 10. (See constraint and rubric below.) 3. Rate **yourself** on the same scale. 4. Add comments to clarify/justify your evaluation. 5. Email the completed form to the grader(s). ### Constraint ### The _total_ number of points you allocate for your group must be less than or equal to 7 * n, where n is the number of people in your group. In the example below, there are 4 people so the total of points must be <= 28. ### Grading Scale ### 9-10 -- Amazing team-mate You will be in contact with them for years One of the **best** team-mates you have ever had for any project 7-8 -- Very good team-mate Contributed significantly Communicated effectively Took initiative in the design and implementation You would **seek out** this person to be a team-mate in a future course 5-6 -- Good team-mate Carried out their assigned responsibilities Contributed to the final product Room for improvement in communication, initiative, effort, or skills You would be **willing to partner** with them in a future course, though you wouldn't seek them out 3-4 -- Fair team-mate Worked hard at contributing to the project Struggled to carry out assigned responsibilities Made minor contributions to the final product You would **prefer not to partner** with this person in a future course 0-3 -- Poor team-mate Did not contribute to the final product Put forth little or insufficient effort Was rarely present at team meetings and was difficult to get a hold of You would **avoid partnering** with this person in a future course ----cut here---- Group Name: Infomat Brutus Bucki 8 O. Aye Ho 4 Dree Slab 6 Signed: Stu Dent 8 Comments: * Include specific comments that justify the quantitative evaluation given above. ----cut here----